Passive income for the Rich
Passive income for the Poor
=
Stealing from the majority of the People
Passive income for the rich and poor CURRENTLY equals out to screwing over the middle (working) class.
Poor people should not be obese.
Rich people should not be able to devise something on paper to hide money.
Loosely speaking, when every 10 years the middle class gets their investment savings wiped out, don't people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, BY DESIGN, gain 30 billion dollars?
So, it's legal for me to be screwed and have to downsize my life. And it's legal for the banks (finance (insurance)) and mismanagement (ie. GM) of uhmerica to get bailed out and bonused when they flop on their face. And without birthing a child into this world with a partner in crime, I have to pay child support and alimony through a broker to a complete stranger.
Ah, irresponsibility rewarded. Free dumb.
What kind of mediated control is the U.S. Dollar anyway?
What kind of distribution is this?
What kind of Cents?
What kind of sense?
If we all are participating, we should all be invested.
Passive income for the rich and poor CURRENTLY equals out to screwing over the middle (working) class.
Again, if I do not have a child, why am I involuntarily paying for children?
If it's not my daddy, why am I kicking up some pyramid scheme vig working while he's sleeping?
Sunday, August 17, 2014
What if money was no longer a motivating factor for the law and justice, but one of patriotism?
What if money was no longer a motivating factor for the law and justice, but one of patriotism?
What if a case were not influenced by money?
Would that not be blind justice?
How can we set this up to be achieved systematically?
Should there be a salary cap on lawyering?
Since we chip in to pay for roads and now we all have to chip in for our health, shouldn't we all have to chip in for our defense of lawyering?
Car insurance. Health Insurance. Law protection/law defense insurance???
Ask yourself this: Can you afford justice?
And if you can, don't you think it would suck if you couldn't? So, depending on how much money you have for someone to REPRESENT you, can dictate if you go to jail (that day) or not.
How can we adjust attitude problems with cultures in America?
What if a case were not influenced by money?
Would that not be blind justice?
How can we set this up to be achieved systematically?
Should there be a salary cap on lawyering?
Since we chip in to pay for roads and now we all have to chip in for our health, shouldn't we all have to chip in for our defense of lawyering?
Car insurance. Health Insurance. Law protection/law defense insurance???
Ask yourself this: Can you afford justice?
And if you can, don't you think it would suck if you couldn't? So, depending on how much money you have for someone to REPRESENT you, can dictate if you go to jail (that day) or not.
How can we adjust attitude problems with cultures in America?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)