Disturbing to me: Without a video, shots in the back and an autopsy didn't concern this fuckwad cop, off the rip.
A country run by lawyers
creating and profiting off of divisiveness instead of cohesiveness,.... and their enforcers.
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
The European Purchase. Geography of the likes of New France and New Germany on the American Land Mass
Imagine if you will that the population grow to the point of practically running out of non sky-scraped land. Imagine a name like these places:
Geography of New Germany
Geography of Newknighted Kingdom
Geography of New Latin Americano
Geography of Quasi Africa
Population growth in land-locked areas in Europe cause a new Real Estate agreement. Nations under a strong republican framework (as opposed to democratic?).
Renting from Siberia Russia? Like an embassy maybe. Imagine all of the rules of France in an exclusive new county/territory in Texas ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_County,_Texas )
Could you see it?
Vast land spaces in Wyoming and Montana. New water sharing agreements.
Hopefully that far into the future co-existence is a much more peaceful of a reality. Sharing lands certainly take cooperation to the next level.
Geography of New Germany
Geography of Newknighted Kingdom
Geography of New Latin Americano
Geography of Quasi Africa
ON THE AMERICAN LAND MASS
Renting from Siberia Russia? Like an embassy maybe. Imagine all of the rules of France in an exclusive new county/territory in Texas ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_County,_Texas )
Could you see it?
Vast land spaces in Wyoming and Montana. New water sharing agreements.
Hopefully that far into the future co-existence is a much more peaceful of a reality. Sharing lands certainly take cooperation to the next level.
 |
| www.aaanativearts.com |
Monday, February 23, 2015
Taking Threats Seriously for a Common Defense
If one doesn't believe in total free speech we have the right to respect them and shut down their communication since there is a brand of islam that is all or nothing. ie. Western technologies as guerrilla warfare hypocrisy of radical islam.
Their purported greatness is self evident in their attempt at world domination as plainly fleeing gypsies with leaders hiding in holes and caves. They embrace the kind of hypocrisy that makes their woman cower as they cover their own faces acting tough while cross-dressing with and abusing those tied up and caged. A people so ugly in the image of their god that the image of his very ugly face perpetuates the ugliest of human kind.
They say they want to annihilate us. Fighters and facilitators against us should have the death penalty. Embrace diversity all you want. Embrace the good parts, yet have expectations of the compromise that makes America more liveable than others. Yes, we're annoyed by selfish people. - One percenters or people that scream "what about me, look at me" in the streets. But when a child wines in public, we prefer them to keep it down. When in Rome. We already say no to "when in Riyadh".
It's not hard.
It's a group of ninja wannabe, child-raping pussies. Inbred like a degenerate breed. I fear them as I would a mythological dog people that sound like gibberish coughing wolves with rabies.
At most a mafia. Muslim Township.
I wouldn't put these people in a cage unless I treated them as they demonstrably wish. With gasoline and a lighter.
If the capital of the Jews is Israel and a small target it is indeed, is the true target of the muslim world Beirut?
Or is all of the control Riyadh laced with gold? Or is it an insular Tehran. That all really sounds so easy one would have to think Indonesia. We treat their degeneracy as a target of tents throughout the globe while our structures await free radicals. To tolerate their murderous hypocrisy in the western world is the highest ranking degree of naivety in the history of mankind. Coddling separatists embedded among us with jobs is naive, even though it is a no-shit-sherlock notion. Incorporating the new world order must be the crazy aim. But in the name of efficiency, what happened with being able to take care of number one first?
Make up your mind. Is race real or not? Caucasian? Don't insult me with such drivel. It must be the ape part of the poster selective science wants to refer to. I like wine. I like water. I like oceans. But I don't want to drink wine all day. Planet of the grapes.
Their purported greatness is self evident in their attempt at world domination as plainly fleeing gypsies with leaders hiding in holes and caves. They embrace the kind of hypocrisy that makes their woman cower as they cover their own faces acting tough while cross-dressing with and abusing those tied up and caged. A people so ugly in the image of their god that the image of his very ugly face perpetuates the ugliest of human kind.
They say they want to annihilate us. Fighters and facilitators against us should have the death penalty. Embrace diversity all you want. Embrace the good parts, yet have expectations of the compromise that makes America more liveable than others. Yes, we're annoyed by selfish people. - One percenters or people that scream "what about me, look at me" in the streets. But when a child wines in public, we prefer them to keep it down. When in Rome. We already say no to "when in Riyadh".
It's not hard.
It's a group of ninja wannabe, child-raping pussies. Inbred like a degenerate breed. I fear them as I would a mythological dog people that sound like gibberish coughing wolves with rabies.
At most a mafia. Muslim Township.
I wouldn't put these people in a cage unless I treated them as they demonstrably wish. With gasoline and a lighter.
If the capital of the Jews is Israel and a small target it is indeed, is the true target of the muslim world Beirut?
Or is all of the control Riyadh laced with gold? Or is it an insular Tehran. That all really sounds so easy one would have to think Indonesia. We treat their degeneracy as a target of tents throughout the globe while our structures await free radicals. To tolerate their murderous hypocrisy in the western world is the highest ranking degree of naivety in the history of mankind. Coddling separatists embedded among us with jobs is naive, even though it is a no-shit-sherlock notion. Incorporating the new world order must be the crazy aim. But in the name of efficiency, what happened with being able to take care of number one first?
Make up your mind. Is race real or not? Caucasian? Don't insult me with such drivel. It must be the ape part of the poster selective science wants to refer to. I like wine. I like water. I like oceans. But I don't want to drink wine all day. Planet of the grapes.
Community Address. Community Watch. Talking to Neighbors.
The local communities and its hubs are where we would worry about being terrorized, especially in mass.
If you drive a few miles to get to the mall, you hope a gunman or a group of them aren't out on a suicide pact in order to make a statement and draw the headlines. You hope that the attack isn't multi-pronged across the map.
Though were it to happen, especially away from "my" home, I think the good news that would come out of it is that all of the lackies out there will get on board for us all to finally end this. We could kill the roaches after realizing that it's not all just a movie on our televisions. You can disconnect the TV but not reality.
Whether it's a group of disenchanted ethnocentric "free dumb fighters" that was born and raised in America, or some gypsy imports we should have never received into the first world order in the first place, it'll suck. But perhaps we'll treat it for what it is: a cockroach. And then we could step on it.
But what about this community watch idea? What about voluntary community door knockers with surveys in hand and channels of communication? Especially in communities with a diverse religious presence. The walls should only feel as though they were closing in on guilty people.
Playing naive is plainly getting old. You'll hope bad things don't happen like some autistic kid getting a hold of a pistol and video games while people like me will wonder when you will jump aboard the regulations of a parent-child construct you want in a fuzzy blanket society. You're going to finally want to react when it's too late and you'll rationalize that it's better late than never when I wasn't naive about the world this entire time. You must be one of those that realized that there's an oligarchy all of the sudden because Princeton University finally told you.
The roads in America are two-way streets. Our compromise is that everyone can't plainly do everything and control everything that they want. When a criminal can be outspoken about their intentions as a career criminal, the bright side is that there is truly free speech in America. But a threat is a threat.
Ignoring someone at their world is ignorant. Here's something profound: ignoring is ignorant.
If you drive a few miles to get to the mall, you hope a gunman or a group of them aren't out on a suicide pact in order to make a statement and draw the headlines. You hope that the attack isn't multi-pronged across the map.
Though were it to happen, especially away from "my" home, I think the good news that would come out of it is that all of the lackies out there will get on board for us all to finally end this. We could kill the roaches after realizing that it's not all just a movie on our televisions. You can disconnect the TV but not reality.
Whether it's a group of disenchanted ethnocentric "free dumb fighters" that was born and raised in America, or some gypsy imports we should have never received into the first world order in the first place, it'll suck. But perhaps we'll treat it for what it is: a cockroach. And then we could step on it.
But what about this community watch idea? What about voluntary community door knockers with surveys in hand and channels of communication? Especially in communities with a diverse religious presence. The walls should only feel as though they were closing in on guilty people.
Playing naive is plainly getting old. You'll hope bad things don't happen like some autistic kid getting a hold of a pistol and video games while people like me will wonder when you will jump aboard the regulations of a parent-child construct you want in a fuzzy blanket society. You're going to finally want to react when it's too late and you'll rationalize that it's better late than never when I wasn't naive about the world this entire time. You must be one of those that realized that there's an oligarchy all of the sudden because Princeton University finally told you.
The roads in America are two-way streets. Our compromise is that everyone can't plainly do everything and control everything that they want. When a criminal can be outspoken about their intentions as a career criminal, the bright side is that there is truly free speech in America. But a threat is a threat.
Ignoring someone at their world is ignorant. Here's something profound: ignoring is ignorant.
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Two Words to Describe the Glib, Proudly Partisan Peoples of America When Cornered
Cognitive Dissonance
At the very least, the next level down is like "Wholesale mind of a child".
At the very least, the next level down is like "Wholesale mind of a child".
Monday, December 15, 2014
The Resistance
 |
| When it literally sounds like this is what you're saying, I cannot bereave. |
There is a resistance to ignorance, also. Some of us are quite simply ignoring the basic facts that we are ALL subject to. Last time I checked, I'm not permitted to resist arrest. No, not today. I suppose one can try. It sounds stupid but it's true.
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Here is what we're fighting over
We're fighting over inequity.
We're fighting over the definition of freedom.
Or a fair share.
-Freedom for all.
-And the Golden Rule
That golden rule thing, by the way, is to treat others as you wish to be treated and essentially expect the same of others. I'm alluding towards a macro-vision of it as it fits in a huge compromise of people living in organized society.
Freedom? Well, if you're lucky enough to be born with more freedom (ie. financial, roving, expression), good for you.
If your parents were better than mine, good for you.
If you're ideas are better, maybe even thanks to your upbringing, good for you.
I just wonder why some people think it's okay to be actionable on their beliefs (maybe even religious ones) to the point where someone takes my money and I don't have a good idea as to where that tithing is going over to.
Roads, I use them.
Protection, I understand it happens with Police and Fire, all the way to infrastructures like the aforementioned roads, and maybe even all the way out to the bully's backyard so that craziness doesn't come to mine.
It's a nice cozy insurance policy of sorts know that things will be taken care of. And now one is being mandated on my choice of health. My life is made up of days to days leading to the years. And those days are made up of choices. And choices are consequential, especially in prioritizing one's survival. And the very rich and the very poor (whatever that means to your soul) get bailed out while the middle class is to expect cuts and decade lost savings. I can't afford lawyers. So, that means I can't afford adequate representation, like let's say Bill Gates or Cosby do. Or banks. Justice for all (of us)? Perhaps we need mandated unlimited law insurance?
More mind-blows.
I don't understand why kids and adults don't use condoms. It is the 21st Century. Communicable diseases like AIDS and the whole idea of birth control in our environmentally conscious societies have been known, even as of last century.
Furthermore, I don't understand why I pay alimony to previously indicated irresponsible people and why I have to pay child support for them. I didn't have sex with them. I use condoms. I don't get to parent them.
Choice is a motherfucker. Sometimes consequences happen. Maybe we're gearing towards no freedom to fail. Just a globally warmed fuzzy blanket of convenience. The truth is that it's at someone elses' expense, accountability hidden like a government black defense project in Area 52. Perhaps that's the area where the trees are grown for the Treasury's mint.
I don't understand why the rich need tax breaks. I don't understand why we continually give incentive for the poor to keep doing what they're doing to live outside of their means, either.
To suit your opinion, to suit your belief system (aka religion) I suppose libertarians are anarchist atheists?
And they might look at you as a Democratic of Church and State that bails out the mentally challenged. And failed that challenge. Forgot to wear condoms. Doesn't know the definition of "hypocrite".
Or a trickle-derivative-dissapating Oligarchist that bails out irresponsible tricky management. And mismanaged. Forgot the definition of "hypocrite".
We try to measure "fair share" in dollars. And do disappearing acts in piles of paper that we pretty much ignore.
Different strokes for different folks. And we want to codify more of it.
I suppose what I'm alluding to is this: Do not be very proud of your registered political affiliation. I can only imagine how ridiculous you look to your 2300A.D. greater grandchildren.
We're fighting over the definition of freedom.
Or a fair share.
-Freedom for all.
-And the Golden Rule
That golden rule thing, by the way, is to treat others as you wish to be treated and essentially expect the same of others. I'm alluding towards a macro-vision of it as it fits in a huge compromise of people living in organized society.
Freedom? Well, if you're lucky enough to be born with more freedom (ie. financial, roving, expression), good for you.
If your parents were better than mine, good for you.
This is where it gets tricky.
If you're ideas are better, maybe even thanks to your upbringing, good for you.
I just wonder why some people think it's okay to be actionable on their beliefs (maybe even religious ones) to the point where someone takes my money and I don't have a good idea as to where that tithing is going over to.
Roads, I use them.
Protection, I understand it happens with Police and Fire, all the way to infrastructures like the aforementioned roads, and maybe even all the way out to the bully's backyard so that craziness doesn't come to mine.
It's a nice cozy insurance policy of sorts know that things will be taken care of. And now one is being mandated on my choice of health. My life is made up of days to days leading to the years. And those days are made up of choices. And choices are consequential, especially in prioritizing one's survival. And the very rich and the very poor (whatever that means to your soul) get bailed out while the middle class is to expect cuts and decade lost savings. I can't afford lawyers. So, that means I can't afford adequate representation, like let's say Bill Gates or Cosby do. Or banks. Justice for all (of us)? Perhaps we need mandated unlimited law insurance?
More mind-blows.
I don't understand why kids and adults don't use condoms. It is the 21st Century. Communicable diseases like AIDS and the whole idea of birth control in our environmentally conscious societies have been known, even as of last century.
Furthermore, I don't understand why I pay alimony to previously indicated irresponsible people and why I have to pay child support for them. I didn't have sex with them. I use condoms. I don't get to parent them.
Choice is a motherfucker. Sometimes consequences happen. Maybe we're gearing towards no freedom to fail. Just a globally warmed fuzzy blanket of convenience. The truth is that it's at someone elses' expense, accountability hidden like a government black defense project in Area 52. Perhaps that's the area where the trees are grown for the Treasury's mint.
I don't understand why the rich need tax breaks. I don't understand why we continually give incentive for the poor to keep doing what they're doing to live outside of their means, either.
To suit your opinion, to suit your belief system (aka religion) I suppose libertarians are anarchist atheists?
And they might look at you as a Democratic of Church and State that bails out the mentally challenged. And failed that challenge. Forgot to wear condoms. Doesn't know the definition of "hypocrite".
Or a trickle-derivative-dissapating Oligarchist that bails out irresponsible tricky management. And mismanaged. Forgot the definition of "hypocrite".
We try to measure "fair share" in dollars. And do disappearing acts in piles of paper that we pretty much ignore.
Different strokes for different folks. And we want to codify more of it.
I suppose what I'm alluding to is this: Do not be very proud of your registered political affiliation. I can only imagine how ridiculous you look to your 2300A.D. greater grandchildren.
Saturday, December 6, 2014
American Politics Hoy, Part II (the quicker fix)
See Part I (the problem)
II.
Some policy think-tankers, for the sake of swiftness, probably fantasize about what they might do as a benevolent American dictator. Very blandly thinking, these would be my urgings:
#1) Fix the taxes. I realize some fog an unaccountability helps to deceive "freedom's" enemies concerning intelligence black budgets our sharp edge (advantage) on the tip of the spear for world policing goodness. I've long ago laughed at our notion of defense and invisible fences.
Make things more equitable. Tax spending on the dollar. Make a leveler such as a legacy or death tax. Can't be done overnight but even if we compromise to chip away at it... have white collar and blue collar distingquishments (ie. cheaper healthcare for those that labor through sweating (I realize this can be fogged thru categorical overcomplicating things like lawyers do like "if I'm stapling for whatever percent of the day, I'm committing labor"). Subsidizing passive income for the rich and poor is screwing up the middle class majority. I'm tired of trying to be swayed, but really getting tugged into some bullshit unequitable argument tug-of-war.
Bottom line: We need to even them out more and let them be less complicated, less difficult to read - Something more towards everyone pitching in the same amount of cents on the dollar. That's more of an equal contribution
#2) I want the contributors of what essentially amounts to child support and alimony to parent the poor dependents of society. Macro-managing by throwing money at the problem is a big fail. Micro-manage it and more folks will either shit or get off the pot. My-house-my-rules-for-the-kids. Here ya' go, Jimmy. Here is a video on condom use. Here, Janey, a boy will succumb to the rules to temper his hormones.
Number 1 and 2 essentially are on a path to correct passive income for the polars and urge everyone to contribute, not just the majority. Shut the hell up with your 1%'s and 10%'s when you don't know a damn thing about economics.
#3) Urge a Black leader to come forward and sit down with the community.. I'm sorry, but the living fire-breathing Reverend has nothing on a guy like Dr. Carson. And I wish Dr. Carson would attack some of the passive income malarchy to his party's corporate contributors. Adjective-Americans are bullshit. Period. Adjective-American'ts anything is stupid and I tire of the hypocrites that cannot see how nonconstructive it is proudly emphasizing one's separation.
It takes a village attitude. It takes a better attitude to have a well-policed village of peers. Peer pressure.
People kid me all the time about how they love freedom when all I see is hypocrites' freedumb.
Americans, be Americans. If I have to call all of you non-team players Adjective-Americans all day long until you see how stupid it is... .
II.
Some policy think-tankers, for the sake of swiftness, probably fantasize about what they might do as a benevolent American dictator. Very blandly thinking, these would be my urgings:
#1) Fix the taxes. I realize some fog an unaccountability helps to deceive "freedom's" enemies concerning intelligence black budgets our sharp edge (advantage) on the tip of the spear for world policing goodness. I've long ago laughed at our notion of defense and invisible fences.
Make things more equitable. Tax spending on the dollar. Make a leveler such as a legacy or death tax. Can't be done overnight but even if we compromise to chip away at it... have white collar and blue collar distingquishments (ie. cheaper healthcare for those that labor through sweating (I realize this can be fogged thru categorical overcomplicating things like lawyers do like "if I'm stapling for whatever percent of the day, I'm committing labor"). Subsidizing passive income for the rich and poor is screwing up the middle class majority. I'm tired of trying to be swayed, but really getting tugged into some bullshit unequitable argument tug-of-war.
Bottom line: We need to even them out more and let them be less complicated, less difficult to read - Something more towards everyone pitching in the same amount of cents on the dollar. That's more of an equal contribution
#2) I want the contributors of what essentially amounts to child support and alimony to parent the poor dependents of society. Macro-managing by throwing money at the problem is a big fail. Micro-manage it and more folks will either shit or get off the pot. My-house-my-rules-for-the-kids. Here ya' go, Jimmy. Here is a video on condom use. Here, Janey, a boy will succumb to the rules to temper his hormones.
Number 1 and 2 essentially are on a path to correct passive income for the polars and urge everyone to contribute, not just the majority. Shut the hell up with your 1%'s and 10%'s when you don't know a damn thing about economics.
#3) Urge a Black leader to come forward and sit down with the community.. I'm sorry, but the living fire-breathing Reverend has nothing on a guy like Dr. Carson. And I wish Dr. Carson would attack some of the passive income malarchy to his party's corporate contributors. Adjective-Americans are bullshit. Period. Adjective-American'ts anything is stupid and I tire of the hypocrites that cannot see how nonconstructive it is proudly emphasizing one's separation.
It takes a village attitude. It takes a better attitude to have a well-policed village of peers. Peer pressure.
People kid me all the time about how they love freedom when all I see is hypocrites' freedumb.
Americans, be Americans. If I have to call all of you non-team players Adjective-Americans all day long until you see how stupid it is... .
American Politics Hoy, Part I (the problem)
We are divisive because things are blatantly unequal and we all see it in different ways. When we're too lock-step as a Democrat or Republican, and not discerning enough to smell out what is funny (laughable and hypocritical) about it, we fail.
Given the current uhmerican attitude of separate but equal american salad bowl (now I understand what the term tossing salad means) where everyone's shit is supposed to smell differently, I see why we have in-fighting:
The
Republican Party could painfully use some better leadership to steer
towards equity, most notably towards the rich passive income people
loopholes. - Their trickle-up economics called something else.Given the current uhmerican attitude of separate but equal american salad bowl (now I understand what the term tossing salad means) where everyone's shit is supposed to smell differently, I see why we have in-fighting:
America is not striving for a perfect union today
by ignoring the polar inequities while vying for the middleclass's
tithe (tax) concerning fair and impartial justice and a more
equal-sharing of tithe.
America's new Gay problem (flavor of the day) domestic priority for a long long time has been ignored. It's really the issue of Justice (and money for it), an issue which is virtually non-existent in donkeyphantican America, and a system which requires your coffers to be adequate from blackmail to accusation for all. Essentially, you have to be able to afford justice or sell yourself to a PR advertising scheme to get it.
As far as the Gay Homosexual problem, perhaps the Republicans should have went something more along the lines of domestic compansionship/civil union route. I don't know what's so difficult about creating a certified roster of who is allowed to visit someone in the emergency room. So many rules of redundancy on the books.
From Homosexual-Americans to Polysexual-Americans, I find that most Americans really don't want to be treated equal through their political ineptitude.
Let's all be Americans. And let's all contribute.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
To Hell with ye Adjective-Americans.
One-team, one fight.
Or one-team, 20 fights and we don't even get off of the ice.
Academia wants statistics and to be presumptuous on arguments as solid as ice, from sickle cell anemia to ice cooling and water warming.
Are there such things as races or aren't there?
There are naturally Adjective-American on Adverb-American Love Crimes involved in statistics, right?
Shut up.
We want to define racism based on prejudices (by definition requiring a basis of experience) but we don't want to see a complication of diversity as it relates to the assimilation that made the sound of a bubbling melting pot glorious.
We don't have to, so we won't walk a mile in someone elses shoes. Ignorance is bliss.
I know this much.
I'm not racist. I'm culturalist.
And as an American, I love my right to respect diversity, especially to the degree with which my culture made America a successful culture of cooperation, abundance and the freedom to volunteer or not.
Or one-team, 20 fights and we don't even get off of the ice.
Academia wants statistics and to be presumptuous on arguments as solid as ice, from sickle cell anemia to ice cooling and water warming.
Are there such things as races or aren't there?
There are naturally Adjective-American on Adverb-American Love Crimes involved in statistics, right?
Shut up.
We want to define racism based on prejudices (by definition requiring a basis of experience) but we don't want to see a complication of diversity as it relates to the assimilation that made the sound of a bubbling melting pot glorious.
We don't have to, so we won't walk a mile in someone elses shoes. Ignorance is bliss.
I know this much.
I'm not racist. I'm culturalist.
And as an American, I love my right to respect diversity, especially to the degree with which my culture made America a successful culture of cooperation, abundance and the freedom to volunteer or not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)