Monday, February 23, 2015

Taking Threats Seriously for a Common Defense

If one doesn't believe in total free speech we have the right to respect them and shut down their communication since there is a brand of islam that is all or nothing.  ie. Western technologies as guerrilla warfare hypocrisy of radical islam.

Their purported greatness is self evident in their attempt at world domination as plainly fleeing gypsies with leaders hiding in holes and caves.  They embrace the kind of hypocrisy that makes their woman cower as they cover their own faces acting tough while cross-dressing with and abusing those tied up and caged.  A people so ugly in the image of their god that the image of his very ugly face perpetuates the ugliest of human kind.

They say they want to annihilate us.  Fighters and facilitators against us should have the death penalty.  Embrace diversity all you want.  Embrace the good parts, yet have expectations of the compromise that makes America more liveable than others.  Yes, we're annoyed by selfish people. - One percenters or people that scream "what about me, look at me" in the streets.  But when a child wines in public, we prefer them to keep it down.  When in Rome.  We already say no to "when in Riyadh".

It's not hard.

It's a group of ninja wannabe, child-raping pussies.  Inbred like a degenerate breed.  I fear them as I would a mythological dog people that sound like gibberish coughing wolves with rabies.

At most a mafia.  Muslim Township.

I wouldn't put these people in a cage unless I treated them as they demonstrably wish.  With gasoline and a lighter.

If the capital of the Jews is Israel and a small target it is indeed, is the true target of the muslim world Beirut?
Or is all of the control Riyadh laced with gold?  Or is it an insular Tehran.  That all really sounds so easy one would have to think Indonesia.  We treat their degeneracy as a target of tents throughout the globe while our structures await free radicals.  To tolerate their murderous hypocrisy in the western world is the highest ranking degree of naivety in the history of mankind.  Coddling separatists embedded among us with jobs is naive, even though it is a no-shit-sherlock notion.  Incorporating the new world order must be the crazy aim.  But in the name of efficiency, what happened with being able to take care of number one first?

Make up your mind.  Is race real or not?  Caucasian?  Don't insult me with such drivel.  It must be the ape part of the poster selective science wants to refer to.  I like wine.  I like water.  I like oceans.  But I don't want to drink wine all day.  Planet of the grapes.

Community Address. Community Watch. Talking to Neighbors.

The local communities and its hubs are where we would worry about being terrorized, especially in mass.

If you drive a few miles to get to the mall, you hope a gunman or a group of them aren't out on a suicide pact in order to make a statement and draw the headlines.  You hope that the attack isn't multi-pronged across the map.

Though were it to happen, especially away from "my" home, I think the good news that would come out of it is that all of the lackies out there will get on board for us all to finally end this.  We could kill the roaches after realizing that it's not all just a movie on our televisions.  You can disconnect the TV but not reality.

Whether it's a group of disenchanted ethnocentric "free dumb fighters" that was born and raised in America, or some gypsy imports we should have never received into the first world order in the first place, it'll suck.  But perhaps we'll treat it for what it is:  a cockroach.  And then we could step on it.

But what about this community watch idea?  What about voluntary community door knockers with surveys in hand and channels of communication?  Especially in communities with a diverse religious presence.  The walls should only feel as though they were closing in on guilty people.

Playing naive is plainly getting old.  You'll hope bad things don't happen like some autistic kid getting a hold of a pistol and video games while people like me will wonder when you will jump aboard the regulations of a parent-child construct you want in a fuzzy blanket society.  You're going to finally want to react when it's too late and you'll rationalize that it's better late than never when I wasn't naive about the world this entire time.  You must be one of those that realized that there's an oligarchy all of the sudden because Princeton University finally told you.

The roads in America are two-way streets.  Our compromise is that everyone can't plainly do everything and control everything that they want.  When a criminal can be outspoken about their intentions as a career criminal, the bright side is that there is truly free speech in America.  But a threat is a threat.

Ignoring someone at their world is ignorant.  Here's something profound:  ignoring is ignorant.