Monday, February 23, 2015

Taking Threats Seriously for a Common Defense

If one doesn't believe in total free speech we have the right to respect them and shut down their communication since there is a brand of islam that is all or nothing.  ie. Western technologies as guerrilla warfare hypocrisy of radical islam.

Their purported greatness is self evident in their attempt at world domination as plainly fleeing gypsies with leaders hiding in holes and caves.  They embrace the kind of hypocrisy that makes their woman cower as they cover their own faces acting tough while cross-dressing with and abusing those tied up and caged.  A people so ugly in the image of their god that the image of his very ugly face perpetuates the ugliest of human kind.

They say they want to annihilate us.  Fighters and facilitators against us should have the death penalty.  Embrace diversity all you want.  Embrace the good parts, yet have expectations of the compromise that makes America more liveable than others.  Yes, we're annoyed by selfish people. - One percenters or people that scream "what about me, look at me" in the streets.  But when a child wines in public, we prefer them to keep it down.  When in Rome.  We already say no to "when in Riyadh".

It's not hard.

It's a group of ninja wannabe, child-raping pussies.  Inbred like a degenerate breed.  I fear them as I would a mythological dog people that sound like gibberish coughing wolves with rabies.

At most a mafia.  Muslim Township.

I wouldn't put these people in a cage unless I treated them as they demonstrably wish.  With gasoline and a lighter.

If the capital of the Jews is Israel and a small target it is indeed, is the true target of the muslim world Beirut?
Or is all of the control Riyadh laced with gold?  Or is it an insular Tehran.  That all really sounds so easy one would have to think Indonesia.  We treat their degeneracy as a target of tents throughout the globe while our structures await free radicals.  To tolerate their murderous hypocrisy in the western world is the highest ranking degree of naivety in the history of mankind.  Coddling separatists embedded among us with jobs is naive, even though it is a no-shit-sherlock notion.  Incorporating the new world order must be the crazy aim.  But in the name of efficiency, what happened with being able to take care of number one first?

Make up your mind.  Is race real or not?  Caucasian?  Don't insult me with such drivel.  It must be the ape part of the poster selective science wants to refer to.  I like wine.  I like water.  I like oceans.  But I don't want to drink wine all day.  Planet of the grapes.

1 comment:

  1. I like State's thinking as far as their rationale is for not dignifying radical groups by utilizing the adjective of religion. I think though that many people are tired of the silent majority, much like the usefulness of the non-nazi German population was for World War II. So, why are we calling a gang of chimps a capitalized "isis" when they're more like star wars cross-dressing iSissies?