Tickle Clown Economics. False conservative & progressive liberal Parties. We need Corrective Party.

There are the allegedly conservative and allegedly progressive parties.

We need a more perfect equality, plain and simple.

I want the corrective party now.  It could easily become the collective party.

The reforms may not initially be as fiscal as we want, but they will be more equal.

However, the incentive thereafter will squash the frills (ie. welfare, corporate and for the poor) (loopholes like cell phones and tax breaks)

Can there be a metric for measuring the immediate impact of a small business getting a tax break from the government?

The establishment is too comfortable from working within the current framework.

The military is socialized.

-Socialize service of the greater good.

Education (that'll control cost for), Medical Practice, and Law.

--Socialize pay in the fields of education, justice and medicine.

Who wants greedy people in these positions of service?

Make welfare more spartan.  People shouldn't want to stay on it.  Poor choices should equal less choices for sure.  That goes for bailout big business gambling.  No more bonuses; no more business.

Let's go ahead and institutionalize and heavily monitor welfare in a provider-dependent framework.  Don't spread section 8 or subsidized housing (theoretically) in every neighborhood.

Ask good questions for a fairer output-based market:  should there be a medium wage for labor?

Medium wage positions could pay less for apprenticeships. 

It is shameful, in America, that we practically know that one of the caucus candidates that is a lock is a liar, and there's panic over the possibility of a bailed real estate broker.

Let's talk about something fundamentally Constitutional:

It is a shame that in a time of war, we're even debating a border.  We're either stupid, or we realize that we're really not fighting a war, and.....and we're willing to gamble with other people's lives and tax dollars.  It makes me sick that so many Americans are comfortable with their detachment, yet cozy up to the idea of the derivative.  Isn't that our beef with Wall Street.  Why does 99% get to vote 1% into danger.  Why does a strong opinion (belief system) import danger and risk unnecessarily and in a time of war?  And with other people's money (our taxes)!  I doubt many, without subsidization, would open up their homes, money, time and effort to house a fleeing family.  And that family flees from it's own culture, not changing many of its oppressive ways to assimilate.  Have we gone mad.  It's almost as though we need to force people to understand by way of a Draft again.

Fat poor people, and bonused bailouts.  We are out of touch.  The middle class worker is getting screwed.  Theory of capability should be enough; not just the if.  Our judgements of ifs and whens is laughable.  If you're amazed of a hijacked passport printer and changeable stamp markers, you are a moron of the highest order.  You're the reason someone in San Bernadino gets it in the back.  You are one of the most incorrect persons in the American context.  You are making America what was England in a Robin Hood tale.  America's aim is less imposition.  Charity.  Volunteering.  Separation of Church and State.  Fairness in money is very measurable.  A preacher's home smells like a tax break gone wild.

Cannot we build a tent city for your charity at borders for those fleeing?

If Hillary lied so bold faced about things so very unhidden, what the hell do you think?
Real estate is the easiest rich there is.  Some can actually fail and rebound in the billions from it.  It's legal gambling.  And the poor and rich have less to lose in doing it.  Last time I checked.  Billionaires doubled their billions in the last 8 years.  Don't be a moron.